Recently increased concern about user’s privacy is observed in various parts of the internet. EFF states that sites are able to pinpoint an user with high accuracy just from headers sent with every request without actually keeping any persistent data, like cookies, in user’s computer. Some paranoid people find it to be a problem.
One quiet evening realisation came that there’s no way all those headers are compulsory to use the HTTP protocol. I was pleasantly surprised to find that the only header required for
HTTP/1.0 does not need any at all! An idea to try browsing the internet without sending an
User-Agent was born that evening.
Given how widely
User-Agent sniffing surfaces in discussions about browser feature detection I was rather pessimistic about this experiment. I’m glad to be proven wrong – most of the websites work without batting an eye. I even have had started a quest of finding one which would actually fail – somebody has to use UA detection somewhere, right?
The first one to disappoint, after a whole day of browsing, was BakaBT – a half open torrent tracker. The second finding was Google Mail which surprised me quite a bit. I visit Youtube and Picasa Web considerably more often than any other Google service and they dealt with missing
User-Agent fine, so I assumed other Google’s services would too. Another interesting finding was that Google seems to save browser version or some related data in cookies so their services started failing only after a browser restart.
After discovering that Mail fails, I started checking all other Google services to see if they failed too – mostly with saddening results.
Admin Control Panel displays
Opening Drive front page simply complains about file not existing, which is a bit strange as I wasn’t opening any file. Opening links to shared files does work though. From the preview screen one can then create a simple document.
Maps application loads fine, but map tiles fail to download with
HTTP 403 (?vector=1, which supposedly enables WebGL maps didn’t work as well). Treasure mode works though.
Such minor mistakes render these services completely unusable. There’s some that fail more gracefully:
- Calendar which redirects to a mobile version;
- Groups serves the old version and lets user to opt into a new one, which works fine if you ignore a scary alert about problem with *.gwt.xml file;
- Picasa Web just shows a warning that the browser is not supported, but otherwise works completely fine;
- Contacts and Youtube work without any noticeable differences.
All in all, if you care about privacy and use something else than Google, browsing without sending
User-Agent is feasible. In case you prefer Google, then it’s not like you care about your privacy after all, do you?
A list of websites I found to fail during my short experiment:
- facebook.com (Don’t feel generous enough to link this one for them)
- arxiv.org (The only one to give a proper explanation on error page so far)
- code.google.com/p/chromium/ (Issue reporting button does not work. Specific to chromium project)
- Google Charts – “Your browser does not support charts”